4.5 Article

Optimization of a Direct Analysis in Real Time/Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Method for Rapid Serum Metabolomic Fingerprinting

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2009.09.004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. School of Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Georgia Institute of Technology
  2. Ovarian Cancer Institute at the School of Biology of the Georgia Institute of Technology
  3. Georgia Research Alliance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metabolomic fingerprinting of bodily fluids can reveal the underlying causes of metabolic disorders associated with many diseases, and has thus been recognized as a potential tool for disease diagnosis and prognosis following therapy. Here we report a rapid approach in which direct analysis in real time (DART) coupled with time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) and hybrid quadrupole TOF (Q-TOF) MS is used as a means for metabolomic fingerprinting of human serum. In this approach, serum samples are first treated to precipitate proteins, and the volatility of the remaining metabolites increased by derivatization, followed by DART MS analysis. Maximum DART MS performance was obtained by optimizing instrumental parameters such as ionizing gas temperature and flow rate for the analysis of identical aliquots of a healthy human serum samples. These variables were observed to have a significant effect on the overall mass range of the metabolites detected as well as the signal-to-noise ratios in DART mass spectra. Each DART run requires only 1.2 min, during which more than 1500 different spectral features are observed in a time-dependent fashion. A repeatability of 4.1% to 4.5% was obtained for the total ion signal using a manual sampling arm. With the appealing features of high-throughput, lack of memory effects, and simplicity, DART MS has shown potential to become an invaluable tool for metabolomic fingerprinting. (J Am Soc Mass Spectrorn 2010, 21, 68-75) (C) 2010 American Society for Mass Spectrometry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available