4.3 Article

Concentration of Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) by Selective Alcoholysis Catalyzed by Lipases

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY
Volume 89, Issue 9, Pages 1633-1645

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1007/s11746-012-2056-4

Keywords

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA); Lipase; Acylglycerols; Lipozyme TL IM; Short-path distillation

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia (Spain) [CTQ2007-64079]
  2. FEDER (European Fund for Regional Development)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this work was to obtain acylglycerols from tuna oil (23 % weight DHA) rich in docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) by selective ethanolysis, catalyzed by lipases. First, seven immobilized lipases were tested and the best DHA concentration and recovery in the acylglycerol fraction were attained with Lipozyme TL IMA (R) from Thermomyces lanuginosus, Lipozyme RM IM from Rhizomucor miehei, and lipase from Thermomyces lanuginosus immobilized on Immobead 150. As it is the cheapest, Lipozyme TL IMA (R) was selected to optimize the reaction conditions. The influence of temperature, reaction time, and ethanol/oil and lipase/oil ratios were studied. Under the optimized conditions (35 A degrees C, ethanol/oil molar ratio 2.3, lipase/oil ratio 5 % weight and 48 h) and for a 56 % conversion, acylglycerols were obtained with a 45 % DHA concentration and 90 % recovery. In these optimized conditions the reaction was scaled up to 766 g of tuna oil and carried out in a batch stirred tank reactor, with the lipase contained in a cartridge filter attached to the stirring rod. The results were similar to those obtained on the smaller scale. The DHA-enriched acylglycerols were separated from the ethyl esters by evaporation of the latter in a short-path vacuum distiller, where the influence of distillation temperature was studied. At 170 A degrees C DHA-rich acylglycerols (44 % DHA) were recovered in the residue with 94.5 % purity and 72 % recovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available