4.3 Article

A first report on coexistence and hybridization of Mytilus trossulus and M-edulis mussels in Greenland

Journal

POLAR BIOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 343-355

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-015-1785-x

Keywords

Mytilus edulis; M. trossulus; Population structure; Hybridization; Greenland; SNPs; Hybrid index

Funding

  1. Leading National Research Centre (KNOW)-the Centre for Polar Studies
  2. statutory topic IV in the IOPAS
  3. [2011/01/B/NZ9/04352 NCN]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Semi-sessile Mytilus mussels are used as indicators of climate changes, but their geographic distribution is not sufficiently known in the Arctic. The aim of this study was to investigate the taxonomic status and genetic differentiation of Mytilus populations in a Northwest Greenlandic fjord at Maarmorilik, impacted by contaminations from a former mine. In this study, mussels were collected at three sites differing in exposure to environmental factors. A total of 54 polymorphic SNPs found in the Mytilus EST and DNA sequences analyzed were successfully applied to 256 individuals. The results provided the first evidence for the existence of M. trossulus in Greenland. The mussel from M. trossulus and M. edulis taxa are shown to coexist and hybridize in the fjord. The three studied sites were found to differ significantly in the distribution of taxa with a higher prevalence of M. trossulus in the inner fjord. The identified M. edulis x M. trossulus hybrids mostly had a hybrid index score of about 0.5, indicating a similar number of alleles characteristic for M. trossulus and M. edulis. There was a low number of backcrosses between 'pure' taxa and hybrids. This newly discovered hybrid zone between the two taxa is unique in comparison with the Canadian populations. As Mytilus mussels in Greenland hitherto have been regarded as the one taxon M. edulis, the results have importance for biogeography and future monitoring and environmental studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available