Journal
POLAR BIOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 1023-1037Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-015-1811-z
Keywords
Vertical distribution; Ontogenic migrations; Acoustics; Target strength; Diel vertical migrations
Categories
Funding
- Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (Beaufort Region Environmental Assessment program)
- ArcticNet
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada
- Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited
- BP Exploration Operating Company Limited
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- W. Garfield Weston foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The offshore marine ecosystem of the Canadian Beaufort Sea faces the double pressure of climate change and industrialization. Polar cod (Boreogadus saida) is a pivotal forage species in this ecosystem, accounting for 95 % of the pelagic fish assemblage. Its vertical distribution over the annual cycle remains poorly documented. Hydroacoustic records from 2006 to 2012 were analysed to test the hypothesis that age-0 polar cod segregate vertically from larger congeners. Trawls and ichthyoplankton nets validated the acoustic signal. Fish length, weight, and biomass were estimated from new regressions of target strength and weight on standard length. Polar cod were vertically segregated by size in all months, with small age-0 juveniles in the epipelagic (< 100 m) layer and larger age-1+ deeper in the water column. From December to March, the biomass of age-1+ peaked in a mesopelagic layer between 200 and 400 m. With increasing irradiance from April to July, the mesopelagic layer deepened and extended to 600 m. Starting in July, age-0 polar cod formed an epipelagic scattering layer that persisted until November. From September onward, age-0 left the epipelagic layer to join small age-1+ in the upper mesopelagic layer. Low biomass in the mesopelagic layer from February to September likely resulted from large polar cod settling on the seafloor to avoid diving marine mammals. Longer ice-free seasons, warmer sea-surface temperatures, or an oil spill at the surface would likely impact epipelagic age-0, while mesopelagic age-1+ would be vulnerable to an eventual oil plume spreading over and above the seafloor.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available