4.7 Review

Frailty and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.06.009

Keywords

Frailty; mortality; hospitalization; heart failure

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30900618, 81270245, 81570298]
  2. Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [16JCZDJC34900]
  3. Croucher Foundation of Hong Kong

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Frailty is a known risk factor for adverse outcomes after cardiac interventions. However, the extent to which it increases the likelihood of adverse outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients remains unexplored. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the impact of frailty on prognosis in this patient population. Design: Meta-analysis. Setting and Participants: PubMed and Embase were searched for studies that investigated the relationship between frailty and outcomes in patients with HF. The search period was from the beginning of the databases through to December 3, 2017. Measures: A total of 342 and 919 entries were retrieved from PubMed and Embase, respectively. Of these, 20 met our inclusion criteria and were therefore included. Results: Frailty significantly increased the risk of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.39-1.82, P < .0001, I-2 = 55%] and hospitalizations (HR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.21-1.42, P < .0001, I-2 = 0%). Moreover, it was predictive of all-cause mortality after ventricular assist device implantation for advanced HF (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.35-1.94, P < .0001, I-2 = 2%). Conclusions/Implications: Frailty is a significant predictor of all-cause mortality and hospital readmissions in HF. Assessment and close monitoring of frailty status of heart failure patients can potentially better guide clinical management of this population. (C) 2018 AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available