4.6 Article

Do-Not-Hospitalize Orders for Individuals with Advanced Dementia: Healthcare Proxies' Perspectives

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 61, Issue 9, Pages 1568-1573

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12406

Keywords

qualitative; do-not-hospitalize orders; advanced dementia

Funding

  1. National Center for Research Resources [KL2 RR025751]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health (NIH), [KL2 TR000074]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To determine how well healthcare proxies (HCPs) understand do-not-hospitalize (DNH) orders and why they may or may not initiate them. Design Semistructured qualitative interviews. Setting Two nursing homes in western Massachusetts. Participants HCPs of nursing home residents with advanced dementia. Measurement In-depth interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Data were qualitatively analyzed in an iterative process, and emergent concepts were conceptually ordered into explanatory categories. Pertinent demographic and clinical information was collected from the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and patient charts. Results Sixteen of 31 eligible HCPs were interviewed. Major findings included barriers to and facilitators of initiating DNH orders. Barriers included a perceived lack of physician involvement in decision-making and limited understanding of DNH orders and the resident's prognosis. Facilitators included a HCPs' personal experience in health care, understanding the prognosis of advanced dementia, and a desire to limit resident distress. Conclusion The potential barriers to and facilitators of HCPs initiating DNH orders identified in this study suggest that HCPs may benefit from more in-depth discussions with healthcare providers when making this decision. Interventions to address these barriers may improve the capacity of HCPs to make informed decisions about DNH orders that reflect individuals' values and wishes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available