4.6 Article

Objectively Measured Physical Activity Is Related to Cognitive Function in Older Adults

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 61, Issue 11, Pages 1927-1931

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12524

Keywords

physical activity; cognition; older adults

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health [R01 HL098425]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [5 T32 GM084896]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectivesTo explore the relationship between cognitive functioning and time spent at different intensities of physical activity (PA) in free-living older adults. DesignCross sectional analyses. SettingContinuing care retirement communities. ParticipantsOlder adults residing in seven continuing care retirement communities in San Diego County with an average age of 83; 70% were female, and 35% had a graduate-level education (N=217). MeasurementsPA was measured objectively using hip worn accelerometers with data aggregated to the minute level. Three cut points were used to assess low light-intensity PA (LLPA), high light-intensity PA (HLPA), and moderate- to vigorous-intensity PA (MVPA). The Trail Making Test (TMT) Parts A and B were completed, and time for each test (seconds) and time for Part B minus time for Part A (seconds) were used as measures of cognitive function. Variables were log-transformed and entered into linear regression models adjusting for demographic factors (age, education, sex) and other PA intensity variables. ResultsLLPA was not related to any TMT test score. HLPA was significantly related to TMT A, B, and B minus A but only in unadjusted models. MVPA was related to TMT B and B minus A after adjusting for demographic variables. ConclusionThere may be a dose response between PA intensity and cognitive functioning in older adults. The stronger findings supporting a relationship between MVPA and cognitive functioning are consistent with previous observational and intervention studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available