4.6 Article

Linking Glycemic Control and Executive Function in Rural Older Adults with Diabetes Mellitus

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages 1123-1127

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02857.x

Keywords

diabetes mellitus; glycemic control; executive function subcortical

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AG17587]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between glycemic control and the executive functioning domain of cognition and to identify risk factors for inadequate glycemic control that may explain this relationship. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: In-person interviews conducted in participants' homes. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-five rural older African Americans, American Indians, and whites with diabetes mellitus (DM) from three counties in south-central North Carolina. MEASUREMENTS: Participants underwent uniform evaluations. Glycemic control was measured using a validated method, and executive function was assessed using a previously established set of measures and scoring procedure. Information pertaining to medication for treatment of DM, knowledge of DM, and DM self-care behaviors were obtained. RESULTS: In linear regression models adjusting for sex, age, education, ethnicity, duration of DM, and depressive symptoms, executive function was significantly associated with glycemic control. A 1-point higher executive function score was associated with a 0.47 lower glycosylated hemoglobin value (P = .01). The association between glycemic control and executive function became nonsignificant (P = .08) when controlling for several glycemic control risk factors, including use of DM medication and DM knowledge. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that poor glycemic control is associated with impairments in performance on composite measures of executive function and that modifiable risk factors for glycemic control such as use of DM medication and DM knowledge may explain this relationship. J Am Geriatr Soc 58: 1123-1127, 2010.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available