Journal
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages 722-729Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02168.x
Keywords
clinical research; study design; statistics; missing data; aging
Categories
Funding
- Pittsburgh and Yale Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Centers [NIA P30 AG-024827, P30AG21342]
- National Institute on Aging [K07 AG023641]
- Hartford Foundation's Pittsburgh Center of Excellence in Geriatric Medicine
- Paul B. Beeson Career Development Award Program [K23AG030977]
- Ortho Biotech [9/04-4/05]
- Eli Lilly Pharmaceuticals [9/02-6/07]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Scientific evidence should guide clinical care, but special methodological challenges influence interpretation of the medical literature pertaining to older adults. Missing data, ranging from lack of individual items in questionnaires to complete loss to follow-up, affect the quality of the evidence and are more likely to occur in studies of older adults because older adults have more health and functional problems that interfere with all aspects of data collection than do younger people. The purpose of this article is to promote knowledge about the risks and consequences of missing data in clinical aging research and to provide an organized approach to prevention and management. Although it is almost never possible to achieve complete data capture, efforts to prevent missing data are more effective than analytical cure. Strategies to prevent missing data include selecting a primary outcome that is easy to determine and devising valid alternate definitions, adapting data collection to the special needs of the target population, pilot testing data collection plans, and monitoring missing data rates during the study and adapting data collection procedures as needed. Key steps in the analysis of missing data include assessing the extent and types of missing data before analysis, exploring potential mechanisms that contributed to the missing data, and using multiple analytical approaches to assess the effect of missing data on the results. Manuscripts should disclose rates of missing data and losses to follow-up, compare dropouts with participants who completed the study, describe how missing data were managed in the analysis phase, and discuss the potential effect of missing data on the conclusions of the study.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available