Journal
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 57, Issue 10, Pages 1850-1855Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02443.x
Keywords
aged; cohort studies; risk factors; disability evaluation; activities of daily living
Categories
Funding
- National Institute on Aging [R37AG17560, R01AG022993, K24AG021507]
- Brookdale Foundation and a Mentored Research Scientist Award [K01AG031324]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
OBJECTIVES To identify risk factors for five different subtypes of disability. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Greater New Haven, Connecticut. PARTICIPANTS Seven hundred fifty-four community-living residents aged 70 and older and initially nondisabled in four essential activities of daily living (bathing, dressing, walking, and transferring). MEASUREMENTS Candidate risk factors were measured every 18 months for 90 months during comprehensive home-based assessments. Disability was assessed during monthly telephone interviews for up to 108 months. In participants who were nondisabled at the start of an 18-month interval, incident episodes of five different disability subtypes were determined during the subsequent 18 months: transient, short-term, long-term, recurrent, and unstable. RESULTS The cumulative incidence rates per 100 person-intervals were 9.8 (95% confidence interval (CI)=8.9-10.6) for transient disability, 3.8 (95% CI=3.3-4.3) for short-term disability, 7.1 (95% CI=6.4-7.8) for long-term disability, 4.7 (95% CI=4.1-5.3) for recurrent disability, and 4.4 (95% CI=3.9-5.0) for unstable disability. In a multivariate analysis, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) was associated with each of the five disability subtypes, with adjusted hazard ratios ranging from 1.10 for transient disability to 1.35 for long-term disability. The only other factors associated with short-term, long-term, and recurrent disability were stroke, visual impairment, and poor grip strength, respectively. Transient disability and unstable disability shared the same set of risk factors-depressive symptoms, stroke, and poor grip strength-in addition to the SPPB. CONCLUSION These results provide mixed evidence to support the distinct nature of the five disability subtypes.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available