4.6 Article

Factors Associated with Accurate Recall of Prior Disability in Older Persons

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 57, Issue 10, Pages 1897-1901

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02478.x

Keywords

aged; cohort studies; risk factors; disability evaluation; activities of daily living

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [R37AG17560, R01AG022993, K24AG021507]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES To identify the factors associated with accurate recall of prior disability. DESIGN Cohort study. SETTING Greater New Haven, Connecticut. PARTICIPANTS Ninety-two participants, included in each of two analytical samples, who were nondisabled at the present time in four essential activities of daily living (ADLs; bathing, dressing, transferring, and walking) but who had had at least 1 month of disability during the prior year as determined from monthly telephone interviews. MEASUREMENTS Participants who did not need help from another person at the present time were asked to recall whether they had needed help from another person to complete the relevant ADL at any time during the previous 12 months. RESULTS Forty-five (48.9%) and 46 (50.0%) of the 92 participants accurately recalled having had disability in the prior year in the first and second analytical samples, respectively. Having at least a high school education was the only factor independently associated with accurate recall in the first analytical sample, with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 3.03 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.11-8.31), whereas a composite disability scale that considered the timing and severity of prior disability was the only factor independently associated with accurate recall in the second analytic sample (AOR=5.38, 95% CI=1.81-16.1). CONCLUSION The results of the current study, coupled with those of previous studies, suggest potential strategies that could be used to more completely and accurately ascertain the occurrence of disability in older persons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available