The effect of dental pulp-capping materials on hard-tissue barrier formation A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background. The authors of this systematic review aimed to compare the effects of pulp-capping materials on hard-tissue barrier formation using histologic assessments. Type of Studies Reviewed. The authors included randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials in humans, with vital therapies performed on healthy permanent teeth undergoing experimental mechanical pulp exposures. They searched electronically in the PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Summon databases and carried out a manual search. Twenty-seven full-text articles were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. After data extraction, the authors performed 2 sets of meta-analyses with odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on 22 studies. Ten studies compared mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) with calcium hydroxide (CH), and 12 compared bonding agents with CH. The authors assessed bias by means of Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk, funnel plots, and Harbord test. Results. The use of MTA was associated with a higher rate of hard-tissue barrier formation than CH. The OR comparing the 2 groups was 2.45 (95% CI, 1.39 to 4.29; P = .002). Use of bonding agents was associated with a lower rate of hard-tissue barrier formation than CH. The OR comparing the 2 groups was 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.05; P < .001). Conclusions and Practical Implications. The results suggest that MTA and CH have positive effects on hard-tissue barrier formation. On the basis of the evidence, the authors conclude that MTA has better effects than CH regarding dental pulp protection in the capping of mechanical pulp exposures. Conversely, bonding agents are inferior to CH.