4.1 Article

Intake of folate, vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 and the risk of CHD:: The japan public health center-based prospective study cohort I

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUTRITION
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 127-136

Publisher

AMER COLLEGE NUTRITION
DOI: 10.1080/07315724.2008.10719684

Keywords

folate; vitamin B-6; vitamin B-12; coronary disease; diet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the association of dietary folate, vitamin B-6 (VB6) and vitamin B-12 (VB12) with the risk of coronary heart disease among middle-aged persons. Methods: A total of 40,803 subjects aged 40-59 years living in the community who were free of prior diagnoses of cardiovascular disease and cancer and who completed a food frequency questionnaire were followed from 1990-1992 to the end of 2001 in the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study. Results: After 468,472 person-years of follow-up, 251 coronary heart disease incidents were documented. Coronary heart disease and definite myocardial infarction were inversely associated with dietary intake of folate, VB6 and VB12 after adjustment for age and sex, but the associations were attenuated after further adjustment for smoking, dietary and other cardiovascular risk factors. However, among non-multivitamin supplement users, multivariable hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) in the highest vs. lowest quintiles of VB6 intake were 0.60 (0.37-0.97) for total coronary heart disease and 0.52 (0.29-0.91) for definite myocardial infarction, and the inverse associations with VB12 were marginally significant. The combination of below-median intake of three vitamins or of only B-6 conferred a twice excess risk of total coronary heart disease. Conclusions: Dietary intake of VB6 was associated with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease among middle-aged non-multivitamin supplement users. Dietary folate and VB12 were also suggested to be protective factors for coronary heart disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available