4.7 Article

Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation The ULTIMATE Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 72, Issue 24, Pages 3126-3137

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.013

Keywords

all-comers; drug-eluting stent; intravascular ultrasound; optimal criteria

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 81270191, NSFC 91439118, NSFC 91639303]
  2. Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province [2014-WSN-058]
  3. Nanjing Health and Family Planning Commission [YKK16124]
  4. Nanjing Health Youth Talent Training project [QRX17017]
  5. Nanjing Municipal Commission of Science Technology [201715026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is associated with fewer major adverse cardiovascular events compared with angiography guidance for patients with individual lesion subset. However, the beneficial effect on major adverse cardiovascular event outcome of IVUS guidance over angiography guidance in all-comers who undergo DES implantation still remains understudied. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to determine the benefits of IVUS guidance over angiography guidance during DES implantation in all-comer patients. METHODS A total of 1,448 all-comer patients who required DES implantation were randomly assigned (1: 1 ratio) to either an IVUS guidance or angiography guidance group. The primary endpoint was target-vessel failure (TVF) at 12 months, including cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target-vessel revascularization (TVR). The procedure was defined as a success if all IVUS-defined optimal criteria were met. RESULTS At 12 months follow-up, 60 TVFs (4.2%) occurred, with 21 (2.9%) in the IVUS group and 39 (5.4%) in the angiography group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.530; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.312 to 0.901; p = 0.019). In the IVUS group, TVF was recorded in 1.6% of patients with successful procedures, compared with 4.4% in patients who failed to achieve all optimal criteria (HR: 0.349; 95% CI: 0.135 to 0.898; p = 0.029). The significant reduction of clinically driven target-lesion revascularization or definite stent thrombosis (HR: 0.407; 95% CI: 0.188 to 0.880; p = 0.018) based on lesion-level analysis by IVUS guidance was not achieved when the patient-level analysis was performed. CONCLUSIONS The present study demonstrates that IVUS-guided DES implantation significantly improved clinical outcome in all-comers, particularly for patients who had an IVUS-defined optimal procedure, compared with angiography guidance. (Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Drug Eluting Stents Implantation in All-Comers Coronary Lesions [ULTIMATE]; NCT02215915) (c) 2018 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available