4.6 Article

Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis Implicates CD4+/CD44high Memory T Cells in the Pathogenesis of Murine Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136298

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Bonn, Germany [DFG EXC306/1, IB 24/9-1, JA 819/5-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mouse strain MRL/MpJ is prone to spontaneously develop autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). To elucidate the genetic control towards the development of the phenotype and to characterize contributions of immunocompetent cell types, MRL/MpJ mice were interbred with three additional strains (BXD2/TYJ, NZM2410/J, CAST/EIJ) for four generations in an advanced intercross line. Cellular phenotypes were determined by flow cytometric quantification of splenic leukocytes and complemented by the histopathological evaluation of pancreatic lesions. An Illumina SNP array was used for genotyping. QTL analyses were performed with the R implementation of HAPPY. Out of 41 leukocyte subpopulations (B cells, T cells and dendritic cells), only three were significantly associated with AIP: While CD4(+)/CD44(high) memory T cells and CD4(+)/CD69(+) T helper (Th) cells correlated positively with the disease, the cytotoxic T cell phenotype CD8(+)/CD44(low) showed a negative correlation. A QTL for AIP on chromosome 2 overlapped with QTLs for CD4(+)/CD44(high) and CD8(+)/CD44(high) memory T cells, FoxP3(+)/CD4(+) and FoxP3(+)/CD8(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs), and CD8(+)/CD69(+) cytotoxic T cells. On chromosome 6, overlapping QTLs for AIP and CD4(+)/IL17(+) Th17 cells and again FoxP3(+)/CD8(+) Tregs were observed. In conclusion, CD4(+)/CD44(high) memory T cells are the only leukocyte subtype that could be linked to AIP both by correlation studies and from observed overlapping QTL. The potential role of this cell type in the pathogenesis of AIP warrants further investigations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available