Journal
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 12, Pages 1081-1091Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.015
Keywords
magnetic resonance imaging; meta-analysis; noninvasive imaging; plaque hemorrhage; prognostic value
Categories
Funding
- Diamed Medizintechnik
- Philips Medical
- VP Diagnostics
- BMB
- NGFN-Plus
- Wellcome Trust
- Foundation for Vascular Dementia Research
- Bayer Healthcare
- Bundesministerium fur Wirtschaft und Technologie
- Deutsche Stiftung Neurologie
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objectives This study sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine precise estimates of the predictive value of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) as determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for cerebrovascular events. Background There is emerging evidence that MR-based carotid atherosclerotic plaque assessment identifies high-risk features associated with cerebrovascular events. However, available data are based on smaller samples with heterogeneous source populations despite a promising value for noninvasive risk stratification. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library through September 2012 for studies that followed >35 individuals after baseline MRI. Independent observers abstracted information on populations, MR techniques, outcomes, and study quality. Risk estimates of the presence of IPH for cerebrovascular events were derived in random effects regression analysis, and causes of heterogeneity were determined in meta-regression analysis. Results We identified 8 eligible studies including 689 participants who underwent carotid MRI. The prevalence of IPH at baseline was high (49.0%). Over a median follow-up of 19.6 months, a total of 108 cerebrovascular events occurred (15.7% event rate). The presence of IPH was associated with an similar to 6-fold higher risk for events (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.98 to 10.87). The annualized event rate in subjects with detectable IPH was 17.71% compared with 2.43% in patients without IPH. Meta-regression analysis showed symptomatic subjects had higher risks as compared with asymptomatic subjects (HR: 11.71, 95% CI: 5.17 to 26.48 vs. HR: 3.50, 95% CI: 2.59 to 4.73, p = 0.0065), Also, differences were observed for sex and sample size (all p < 0.01), with moderate visual publication bias due to missing smaller sample-size studies (p = 0.18). Conclusions Presence of IPH on MRI strongly predicts cerebrovascular events. Homogenization of future studies is warranted to allow for sufficient assessment of level of evidence for intervention trials. (C) 2013 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available