Journal
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 24, Pages 2318-2325Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.053
Keywords
atrial tachycardia; catheter ablation; ganglionated plexi; implantable loop recorder; paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; pulmonary vein isolation
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate whether the combination of conventional pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by circumferential antral ablation with ganglionated plexi (GP) modification in a single ablation procedure, yields higher success rates than PVI or GP ablation alone, in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Background Conventional PVI transects the major left atrial GP, and it is possible that autonomic denervation by inadvertent GP ablation plays a central role in the efficacy of PVI. Methods A total of 242 patients with symptomatic PAF were recruited and randomized as follows: 1) circumferential PVI (n = 78); 2) anatomic ablation of the main left atrial GP (n = 82); or 3) circumferential PVI followed by anatomic ablation of the main left atrial GP (n = 82). The primary endpoint was freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) or other sustained atrial tachycardia (AT), verified by monthly visits, ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, and implantable loop recorders, during a 2-year follow-up period. Results Freedom from AF or AT was achieved in 44 (56%), 39 (48%), and 61 (74%) patients in the PVI, GP, and PVI+GP groups, respectively (p = 0.004 by log-rank test). PVI+GP ablation strategy compared with PVI alone yielded a hazard ratio of 0.53 (95% confidence interval: 0.31 to 0.91; p = 0.022) for recurrence of AF or AT. Fluoroscopy duration was 16 +/- 3 min, 20 +/- 5 min, and 23 +/- 5 min for PVI, GP, and PVI+GP groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Post-ablation atrial flutter did not differ between groups: 5.1% in PVI, 4.9% in GP, and 6.1% in PVI+GP. No serious adverse procedure-related events were encountered. Conclusions Addition of GP ablation to PVI confers a significantly higher success rate compared with either PVI or GP alone in patients with PAF. (Circumferential Versus Ganglionated Plexi Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation [AF]; NCT00671905) (C) 2013 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available