4.7 Article

Sex Differences in Arterial Stiffness and Ventricular-Arterial Interactions

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 96-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.997

Keywords

aortic stiffness; diastolic dysfunction; echocardiography; sex specific; ventricular-arterial interaction

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL89354, M01 RR00585]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives This study sought to assess sex differences in ventricular-arterial interactions. Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is more prevalent in women than in men, but the basis for this difference remains unclear. Methods Echocardiography and arterial tonometry were performed to quantify arterial and ventricular stiffening and interaction in 461 participants without heart failure (189 men, age 67 +/- 9 years; 272 women, age 65 +/- 10 years). Aortic characteristic impedance (Z(c)), total arterial compliance (pulsatile load), and systemic vascular resistance index (steady load) were compared between men and women, and sex-specific multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess associations of these arterial parameters with diastolic dysfunction and ventricular-arterial coupling (effective arterial elastance/left ventricular end-systolic elastance [Ea/Ees]) after adjustment for potential confounders. Results Z(c) was higher and total arterial compliance was lower in women, whereas systemic vascular resistance index was similar between sexes. In women but not men, higher log Z(c) was associated with mitral inflow E/A ratio (beta +/- SE: -0.17 +/- 0.07), diastolic dysfunction (odds ratio: 7.8; 95% confidence interval: 2.0 to 30.2) and Ea/Ees (beta +/- SE: 0.13 +/- 0.04) (p <= 0.01 for all). Similarly, total arterial compliance was associated with E/A ratio (beta +/- SE: 0.12 +/- 0.04), diastolic dysfunction (odds ratio: 0.33; 95% confidence interval: 0.12 to 0.89), and Ea/Ees (beta +/- SE: -0.09 +/- 0.03) in women only (p <= 0.03 for all). Systemic vascular resistance index was not associated with diastolic dysfunction or Ea/Ees. Conclusions Proximal aortic stiffness (Z(c)) is greater in women than men, and women may be more susceptible to the deleterious effects of greater pulsatile and early arterial load on diastolic function and ventricular-arterial interaction. This may contribute to the greater risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in women. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:96-103) (C) 2013 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available