4.7 Article

Diagnosis of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection by Optical Coherence Tomography

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 12, Pages 1073-1079

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.082

Keywords

optical coherence tomography; spontaneous coronary artery dissection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives This study sought to assess the diagnostic value of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with suspected spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD). Background SCAD is a rare but challenging clinical entity. Methods Following a prospective protocol, OCT was performed in 17 consecutive patients with a clinical and angiographic suspicion of SCD from a total of 5,002 patients undergoing coronary angiography. A conservative management strategy was followed. Results OCT ruled out the diagnosis of SCAD in 6 patients with coronary artery disease (atherosclerotic plaques and/or intracoronary thrombus). In 11 patients (age 48 +/- 9 years, 9 female), OCT confirmed the presence of SCAD. A double-lumen or intramural hematoma image was visualized in all cases. However, only 3 patients presented an intimal flap on angiography. OCT readily identified the intimal rupture site (n = 7), the thickness (348 +/- 84 mu m) and length (31 +/- 9 mm) of the intimomedial membrane, the area of the true (1.1 +/- 0.5 mm(2)) and false lumen (5.9 +/- 2.1 mm(2)), the associated intramural hematoma (n = 9), and thrombi in the true or false lumens (n = 11). Most of these findings were angiographically silent. After stenting (n = 4), OCT disclosed adequate stent coverage, expansion, and apposition, but also residual intramural hematoma at the stented site (abluminal) and at the distal vessel. Conclusions OCT provides unique insights in patients with SCAD that allow an early diagnosis and adequate management. Most of these findings are undetectable by angiography. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1073-9) (C) 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available