Journal
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages 521-528Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.073
Keywords
assist device; heart failure; right ventricle; strain
Categories
Funding
- Thoratec
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objectives This study sought to determine the utility of quantitation of right ventricular (RV) function in predicting RV failure in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Background Clinical evaluation alone seems insufficient for predicting RV failure, an important cause of morbidity and mortality after LVAD implantation. Methods Clinical, hemodynamic, and echocardiographic data were collected on 117 patients undergoing LVAD implantation. Standard pre-procedural echocardiographic RV measurements were supplemented by velocity vector imaging of RV free wall longitudinal strain. RV failure was defined as the need for placement of an RV assist device, or the use of inotropic agents for >14 days. Receiver operating characteristic curves were derived, with resampling to generate valid estimates of prediction accuracy. A net reclassification index was calculated for comparison of risk scores. Results RV failure occurred in 47 of 117 patients (40%). There was a significant difference in peak strain between patients with and without RV failure (-9.0% vs. -12.2%; p < 0.01). A peak strain cutoff of -9.6% predicted RV failure with 76% specificity and 68% sensitivity. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis including variables from the established Michigan RV risk score, peak strain remained an independent predictor of RV failure. RV strain was incremental to the Michigan risk score as a predictor of RV failure (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.77 vs. 0.66; p < 0.01). The net reclassification index with strain was +10.4%. Conclusions Reduced RV free wall peak longitudinal strain was associated with an increased risk for RV failure among patients undergoing LVAD implantation. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:521-8) (C) 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available