4.7 Article

Long-Term Follow-Up of Percutaneous Repair of Paravalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 21, Pages 2218-2224

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.041

Keywords

percutaneous repair; prosthesis; regurgitation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives The goal of this study was to determine the long-term clinical efficacy of percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation. Background Percutaneous repair has emerged as an effective therapy for patients with paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation. Methods We retrospectively identified 126 patients who underwent catheter-based treatment of symptomatic prosthetic paravalvular regurgitation. Patients were contacted for symptoms, clinical events, and vital status. Results The 3-year estimate for survival was 64.3% (95% confidence interval: 52.1% to 76.8%). Mortality occurred due to cardiac, noncardiac, and unknown causes in 9.5%, 7.1%, and 5.6% of patients, respectively. Among survivors, 72% of patients who had presented with heart failure were free of severe symptoms and need for cardiac surgery. Severity of residual regurgitation was not related to overall survival but was an important determinant of other clinical events. For those with no, mild, or moderate or severe residual regurgitation, 3-year estimate of survival free of death or need for surgery was 63.3%, 58.3%, and 30.3% (p = 0.01), respectively. Conclusions Percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation can lead to durable symptom relief in selected patients. Nonetheless, mortality remains significant in symptomatic patients with paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation. Long-term clinical efficacy is highly dependent on residual regurgitation. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:2218-24) (C) 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available