4.7 Article

The Short QT Syndrome Proposed Diagnostic Criteria

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 7, Pages 802-812

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.048

Keywords

arrhythmia; genetics; short QT syndrome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives We aimed to develop diagnostic criteria for the short QT syndrome (SQTS) to facilitate clinical evaluation of suspected cases. Background The SQTS is a cardiac channelopathy associated with atrial fibrillation and sudden cardiac death. Ten years after its original description, a consensus regarding an appropriate QT interval cutoff and specific diagnostic criteria have yet to be established. Methods The MEDLINE database was searched for all reported cases of SQTS in the English language, and all relevant data were extracted. The distribution of QT intervals and electrocardiographic (ECG) features in affected cases were analyzed and compared to data derived from ECG analysis from general population studies. Results A total of 61 reported cases of SQTS were identified. Index events, including sudden cardiac death, aborted cardiac arrest, syncope, and/or atrial fibrillation occurred in 35 of 61 (57.4%) cases. The cohort was predominantly male (75.4%) and had a mean QT(c) value of 306.7 ms with values ranging from 248 to 381 ms in symptomatic cases. In reference to the ECG characteristics of the general population, and in consideration of clinical presentation, family history, and genetic findings, a highly sensitive diagnostic scoring system was developed. Conclusions Based on a comprehensive review of 61 reported cases of the SQTS, formal diagnostic criteria have been proposed that will facilitate diagnostic evaluation in suspected cases of SQTS. Diagnostic criteria may lead to a greater recognition of this condition and provoke screening of at-risk family members. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 802-12) (C) 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available