4.7 Article

Inhibitory Effects of Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel on Platelet Function in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes The PLATO (PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes) PLATELET Substudy

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 18, Pages 1456-1462

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.100

Keywords

clopidogrel; coronary artery disease; P2Y(12) receptor; platelet; platelet inhibitor

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Daiichi-Sankyo/Eli Lilly
  3. Schering-Plough
  4. Novartis
  5. Teva
  6. Brisol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi
  7. Medicines Co.
  8. Dynabyte
  9. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  10. Sanofi-Aventis
  11. Eli Lilly Co.
  12. Daiichi Sankyo Inc.
  13. GlaxoSmithKline
  14. Otsuka
  15. Portola
  16. Accumetrics
  17. Eisai
  18. Johnson Johnson
  19. Bristol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi
  20. Intekrin Therapeutics
  21. Merck
  22. Takeda
  23. Scientific advisory board of AstraZeneca
  24. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  25. Lilly

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives The PLATO (PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes) PLATELET substudy aimed to compare the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Background The PLATO study demonstrated superiority of ticagrelor over clopidogrel in the prevention of ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Methods Patients were randomized to receive either clopidogrel (300- to 600-mg loading dose [LD], 75 mg/day) or ticagrelor (180-mg LD, 90 mg twice daily). The effects of maintenance therapy were studied in 69 patients pre- and 2 to 4 h post-dose after at least 28 days. The LD effect was studied in 24 clopidogrel-naive patients. Light transmittance aggregometry (adenosine diphosphate 5 to 20 mu M), VerifyNow P2Y12, and VASP phosphorylation assays were performed. Results During maintenance therapy, ticagrelor achieved greater suppression of platelet reactivity compared with clopidogrel. The mean maximum light transmittance aggregometry responses (adenosine diphosphate 20 mu M) post-maintenance dose were 44 +/- 15% for clopidogrel and 28 +/- 10% for ticagrelor (p < 0.001). High platelet reactivity was seen more frequently in the clopidogrel group. Proton pump inhibitor use was associated with higher platelet reactivity with clopidogrel but not ticagrelor. The ticagrelor LD also achieved greater inhibition of platelet aggregation compared with the clopidogrel LD. Conclusions Ticagrelor achieves greater antiplatelet effect than clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes, both in the first hours of treatment and during maintenance therapy. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1456-62) (C) 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available