4.7 Article

Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Left Ventricular Twist

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 14, Pages 1317-1325

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.063

Keywords

heart failure; cardiac resynchronization therapy; left ventricular twist; left ventricular reverse remodeling; left ventricular lead position

Funding

  1. Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
  2. Department of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  3. Department of Cardiology, Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands Utrecht, Utrecht
  4. European Society of Cardiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives This study explored the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on left ventricular (LV) twist, particularly in relation to LV lead position. Background LV twist is emerging as a comprehensive index of LV function. Methods Eighty heart failure patients were included. Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed at baseline, immediately after CRT, and at 6-month follow-up. Speckle-tracking analysis was applied to assess LV twist. The LV lead was placed preferably in a (postero) lateral vein, and at fluoroscopy, the position was classified as basal, midventricular, or apical. Response to CRT was defined as reduction of LV end-systolic volume >= 15% at 6-month follow-up. A control group comprised 30 normal subjects. Results Peak LV twist in heart failure patients was 4.8 +/- 2.6 degrees compared with 15.0 +/- 3.6 degrees in the control subjects (p < 0.001). At 6-month follow-up, peak LV twist significantly improved only in responders (56%), from 4.3 +/- 2.4 degrees to 8.5 +/- 3.2 degrees (p < 0.001). The strongest predictor of response to CRT was the improvement of peak LV twist immediately after CRT (odds ratio: 1.899, 95% confidence interval: 1.334 to 2.703, p < 0.001). Furthermore, LV twist significantly improved in patients with an apical (from 4.3 +/- 3.1 degrees to 8.6 +/- 3.0 degrees, p = 0.001) and midventricular (from 4.8 +/- 2.2 degrees to 6.4 +/- 3.9 degrees, p = 0.038) but not with a basal (5.0 +/- 3.3 degrees vs. 4.1 +/- 3.2 degrees, p = 0.28) LV lead position. Similarly, LV ejection fraction significantly increased in patients with an apical (from 26 +/- 7% to 37 +/- 7%, p < 0.001) and midventricular (from 26 +/- 6% to 33 +/- 8%, p < 0.001) but not with a basal (26 +/- 5% vs. 28 +/- 8%, p = 0.30) LV lead position. Conclusions An immediate improvement of LV twist after CRT predicts LV reverse remodeling at 6-month follow-up. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 1317-25) (C) 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available