4.7 Article

Skeletal Muscle Microvascular Flow in Progressive Peripheral Artery Disease Assessment With Continuous Arterial Spin-Labeling Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 25, Pages 2372-2377

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.033

Keywords

arterial spin-labeling; magnetic resonance imaging; peripheral arterial disease; skeletal muscle

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01HL075649]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives We present the novel application of continuous arterial spin-labeling (CASL) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the measurement of calf muscle perfusion in subjects with progressive peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Background Peripheral arterial disease is largely considered to be a disease of conduit vessels. The impact of PAD upon microvascular flow in the end-organ, muscle, remains unknown. Continuous arterial spin-labeling is a noninvasive MRI method capable of measuring microvascular flow and might assist in our understanding of the impact of PAD upon the microvasculature. Methods Forty subjects with varying degrees of PAD and 17 age-matched PAD-free subjects were recruited and underwent measurement of the ankle-to-brachial index (ABI) and CASL. Peak hyperemic flow (PHF) and time-to-peak (TTP) were computed and assessed as a function of ABI and calf muscle group. Results An ABI dependence was found in both PHF (p = 0.04) and TTP (p < 10(-4)). Whereas TTP increased almost immediately with increasing PAD severity, PHF was, in contrast, relatively well preserved until later stages of disease. Conclusions The CASL flow measurements correlate with disease state as measured by ABI and demonstrate preserved microvascular flow reserve in the presence of early to intermediate vascular disease. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 2372-7) (C) 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available