4.7 Article

Baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is an important predictor of the benefit of intensive lipid-lowering therapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 11, Pages 914-920

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.046

Keywords

LDL-C; lipid-lowering therapy; atorvastatin; pravastatin; outcomes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives This study sought to determine whether the benefit of intensive lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is dependent on baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Background Aggressive LDL-C reduction with statins improves cardiovascular outcomes in acute and chronic coronary heart disease (CHD). The importance of baseline LDL-C is unclear. Methods We compared 2-year composites of death, myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina, revascularization > 30 days, and stroke (primary end point), and CHD death, MI, and revascularization > 30 days (secondary end point) in 2,986 statin-naive patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) randomized to atorvastatin 80 mg versus pravastatin 40 mg in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 (Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22) study stratified by quartiles of baseline LDL-C. Multivariable models assessed whether the treatment benefit was dependent on baseline LDL-C. Results A significant reduction in the hazards of the primary (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47 to 0.85, p = 0.002) and secondary (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.79, p = 0.001) end points occurred in patients within the highest quartile (> 132 mg/dl) of baseline LDL-C treated with atorvastatin 80 mg. The benefit of intensive therapy progressively declined as baseline LDL-C decreased. The lowest quartile (LDL-C <= 92 mg/dl) experienced similar rates of the primary (HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.25, p = 0.63) and secondary (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.35, p = 0.89) end points. Adjusted interaction tests between treatment and highest versus lowest baseline LDL-C quartile were significant for the primary and secondary end points (p = 0.03 and p = 0.007, respectively). Analyzing baseline LDL-C as a continuous variable, atorvastatin 80 mg was associated with improved outcomes provided the baseline LDL-C was > 66 mg/dl. Conclusions A progressive reduction in the benefit of intensive LLT with atorvastatin 80 mg over pravastatin 40 mg occurred in statin-naive ACS patients as baseline LDL-C declined. (Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 22 [PROVE IT-TIMI 22]; NCT00382460).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available