4.8 Article

Additivity of Substituent Effects in Aromatic Stacking Interactions

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 136, Issue 40, Pages 14060-14067

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja504378p

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE 1310139, CHE 1048629, CHE 0911616]
  2. Division Of Chemistry
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1310139, 0911616, 1048629] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of this study was to experimentally test the additivity of the electrostatic substituent effects (SEs) for the aromatic stacking interaction. The additivity of the SEs was assessed using a small molecule model system that could adopt an offset face-to-face aromatic stacking geometry. The intramolecular interactions of these molecular torsional balances were quantitatively measured via the changes in a folded/unfolded conformational equilibrium. Five different types of substituents were examined (CH3, OCH3, Cl, CN, and NO2) that ranged from electron-donating to electron-withdrawing. The strength of the intramolecular stacking interactions was measured for 21 substituted aromatic stacking balances and 21 control balances in chloroform solution. The observed stability trends were consistent with additive SEs. Specifically, additive SE models could predict SEs with an accuracy from +/-0.01 to +/-0.02 kcal/mol. The additive SEs were consistent with Wheeler and Houks direct SE model. However, the indirect or polarization SE model cannot be ruled out as it shows similar levels of additivity for two to three substituent systems, which were the number of substituents in our model system. SE additivity also has practical utility as the SEs can be accurately predicted. This should aid in the rational design and optimization of systems that utilize aromatic stacking interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available