4.8 Article

Gold(III) Macrocycles: Nucleotide-Specific Unconventional Catalytic Inhibitors of Human Topoisomerase I

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 136, Issue 15, Pages 5670-5682

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja412350f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AuTEK Biomed (Advanced Materials Division of MINTEK, RSA)
  2. National Research Foundation (RSA)
  3. University of KwaZulu-Natal
  4. Topo-GEN Inc., Port Orange
  5. NIH through the DTP
  6. University of Central Florida
  7. Fulbright Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Topoisomerase IB (Top 1) is a key eukaryotic nuclear enzyme that regulates the topology of DNA during replication and gene transcription. Anticancer drugs that block Top1 are either well-characterized interfacial poisons or lesser-known catalytic inhibitor compounds. Here we describe a new class of cytotoxic redox-stable cationic Au3+ macrocycles which, through hierarchical cluster analysis of cytotoxicity data for the lead compound, 3, were identified as either poisons or inhibitors of Top1. Two pivotal enzyme inhibition assays prove that the compounds are true catalytic inhibitors of Top1. Inhibition of human topoisomerase 11 alpha (Top2 alpha) by 3 was 2 orders of magnitude weaker than its inhibition of Top1, confirming that 3 is a type I-specific catalytic inhibitor. Importantly, Au3+ is essential for both DNA intercalation and enzyme inhibition. Macromolecular simulations show that 3 intercalates directly at the 5'-TA-3' dinucleotide sequence targeted by Top1 via crucial electrostatic interactions, which include pi-pi stacking and an Au center dot center dot center dot O contact involving a thymine carbonyl group, resolving the ambiguity of conventional (drug binds protein) vs unconventional (drug binds substrate) catalytic inhibition of the enzyme. Surface plasmon resonance studies confirm the molecular mechanism of action elucidated by the simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available