4.8 Article

Size-Dependent Catalytic Activity of Supported Vanadium Oxide Species: Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 136, Issue 21, Pages 7751-7761

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja503130z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt fellowship
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Sonderforschungsbereich 546]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Possible reaction pathways for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane by vanadium oxide catalysts supported on silica are examined by density functional theory. Monomeric and dimeric vanadium oxide species are both considered and modeled by vanadyl-substituted silsesquioxanes. The reaction proceeds in two subsequent steps. In a first step, hydrogen abstraction from propane by a vanadyl (O=V) group yields a propyl radical bound to a HOVIV surface site. Propene is formed by a second hydrogen abstraction, either at the same vanadia site or at a different one. V-V/V-IV redox cycles are preferred over V-V/V-III cycles. Under the assumption of fast reoxidation, microkinetic simulations show that the first step is rate-determining and yields Arrhenius barriers that are lower for dimers (114 kJ/mol at 750 K) than for monomers (124 kJ/mol). The rate constants predicted for a mixture of monomers and dimers are 14% larger (750 K) than for monomers only, although the increase remains within experimental uncertainty limits. Direct calculations of energy barriers also yield lower values for dimeric species than for monomeric ones. Reactivity descriptors indicate that this trend will continue also for larger oligomers. The size distribution of oligomeric species is predicted to be rather statistical. This, together with the small increase in the rate constants, explains that turnover frequencies observed for submonolayer coverages of vanadia on silica do not vary with the loading within the experimental uncertainty limits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available