4.8 Article

Interdependency of Subsurface Carbon Distribution and Graphene-Catalyst Interaction

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 136, Issue 39, Pages 13698-13708

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja505454v

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. St. John's College, Cambridge
  2. ERC grant InsituNANO [279342]
  3. EPSRC [EP/K016636/1]
  4. EU [604391]
  5. Cambridge Commonwealth Trust
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K016636/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. EPSRC [EP/K016636/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [279342] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dynamics of the graphene-catalyst interaction during chemical vapor deposition are investigated using in situ, time- and depth-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and complementary grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations coupled to a tight-binding model. We thereby reveal the interdependency of the distribution of carbon close to the catalyst surface and the strength of the graphene-catalyst interaction. The strong interaction of epitaxial graphene with Ni(111) causes a depletion of dissolved carbon close to the catalyst surface, which prevents additional layer formation leading to a self-limiting graphene growth behavior for low exposure pressures (10(-6)-10(-3) mbar). A further hydrocarbon pressure increase (to similar to 10(-1) mbar) leads to weakening of the graphene-Ni(111) interaction accompanied by additional graphene layer formation, mediated by an increased concentration of near-surface dissolved carbon. We show that growth of more weakly adhered, rotated graphene on Ni(111) is linked to an initially higher level of near-surface carbon compared to the case of epitaxial graphene growth. The key implications of these results for graphene growth control and their relevance to carbon nanotube growth are highlighted in the context of existing literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available