4.8 Article

Hydrogen-Bond Networks: Strengths of Different Types of Hydrogen Bonds and An Alternative to the Low Barrier Hydrogen-Bond Proposal

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 135, Issue 47, Pages 17919-17924

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja408762r

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1111678, CHE-1213596]
  2. Petroleum Research Fund
  3. Minnesota Supercomputer Institute for Advanced Computational Research
  4. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  5. DOE's Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  6. Division Of Chemistry
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1213596] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report quantifying the strengths of different types of hydrogen bonds in hydrogen-bond networks (HBNs) via measurement of the adiabatic electron detachment energy of the conjugate base of a small covalent polyol model compound (i.e., (HOCH2CH2CH(OH)CH2)(2)CHOH) in the gas phase and the pK(a) of the corresponding acid in DMSO. The latter result reveals that the hydrogen bonds to the charged center and those that are one solvation shell further away (i.e., primary and secondary) provide 5.3 and 2.5 pK(a) units of stabilization per hydrogen bond in DMSO. Computations indicate that these energies increase to 8.4 and 3.9 pK(a) units in benzene and that the total stabilizations are 16 (DMSO) and 25 (benzene) pK(a) units. Calculations on a larger linear heptaol (i.e., (HOCH2CH2CH(OH)CH2CH(OH)CH2)(2)CHOH) reveal that the terminal hydroxyl groups each contribute 0.6 pK(a) units of stabilization in DMSO and 1.1 pK(a) units in benzene. All of these results taken together indicate that the presence of a charged center can provide a powerful energetic driving force for enzyme catalysis and conformational changes such as in protein folding due to multiple hydrogen bonds in a HBN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available