4.8 Article

Nanoscale Phase Separation in Sequence-Defined Peptoid Diblock Copolymers

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 135, Issue 38, Pages 14119-14124

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja404233d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Soft Matter Electron Microscopy Program
  2. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Science, U.S. Department of Energy [xDE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microphase-separated block copolymer materials have a wide array of potential applications ranging from nanoscale lithography to energy storage. Our understanding of the factors that govern the morphology of these systems is based on comparisons between theory and experiment. The theories generally assume that the chains are perfectly monodisperse; however, typical experimental copolymer preparations have polydispersity indices (PDIs) ranging from 1.01 to 1.10. In contrast, we present a systematic study of the relationship between chemical structure and morphology in the solid state using peptoid diblock copolymers with PDIs of <= 1.00013. A series of comb-like peptoid block copolymers, poly(N-2-(2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethylglycine)-block-poly(N-(2-ethylhexyl)glycine) (pNte-b-pNeh), were obtained by solid-phase synthesis. The number of monomers per chain was held fixed at 36, while the volume fraction of the Nte block (ON,e) was varied from 0.11 to 0.65. The experimentally determined order-disorder transition temperature exhibited a maximum at phi N-te = 0.24, not phi(Nte) = 0.5 as expected from theory. All of the ordered phases had a lamellar morphology, even in the case of phi(Nte) = 0.11. Our results are in qualitative disagreement with all known theories of microphase separation in block copolymers. This raises new questions about the intertwined roles of monomer architecture and polydispersity in the phase behavior of diblock copolymers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available