4.8 Article

Lithium-Sulfur Battery Cathode Enabled by Lithium-Nitrile Interaction

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 135, Issue 2, Pages 763-767

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja309435f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Energy Materials Center at Cornell, an Energy Frontier Research Center
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DESC0001086]
  3. National Science Foundation, Partnerships for Innovation Program [IIP-1237622]
  4. ACS Division of Analytical Chemistry
  5. Eastman Chemical Co.
  6. NSF [DMR-1120296]
  7. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh
  8. Directorate For Engineering [1237622, 1114275] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium sulfide is a promising cathode material for high-energy lithium ion batteries because, unlike elemental sulfur, it obviates the need for metallic lithium anodes. Like elemental sulfur, however, a successful lithium sulfide cathode requires an inherent mechanism for preventing lithium polysulfide dissolution and shuttling during electrochemical cycling. A new scheme is proposed to create composites based on lithium sulfide uniformly dispersed in a carbon host, which serve to sequester polysulfides. The synthesis methodology makes use of interactions between lithium ions in solution and nitrile groups uniformly distributed along the chain backbone of a polymer precursor (e.g., polyacrylonitrile), to control the distribution of lithium sulfide in the host material. The Li2S-carbon composites obtained by carbonizing the precursor are evaluated as cathode materials in a half-cell lithium battery, and are shown to yield high galvanic charge/discharge capacities and excellent Coulombic efficiency, demonstrating the effectiveness of the architecture in homogeneously distributing Li2S and in sequestering lithium polysulfides.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available