4.8 Article

Two Metals Are Better Than One in the Gold Catalyzed Oxidative Heteroarylation of Alkenes

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 133, Issue 36, Pages 14293-14300

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja2012627

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Catalytic Hydrocarbon Functionalization, an Energy Frontier Research Center
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001298]
  3. ARO-DURIP
  4. ONR-DURIP
  5. NIH Kirchstein-NRSA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a detailed study of the mechanism for oxidative heteroarylation, based on DFT calculations and experimental observations. We propose binuclear Au(II)-Au(II) complexes to be key intermediates in the mechanism for gold catalyzed oxidative heteroarylation. The reaction is thought to proceed via a gold redox cycle involving initial oxidation of Au(I) to binuclear Au(II)-Au(II) complexes by Selectfluor, followed by heteroauration and reductive elimination. While it is tempting to invoke a transmetalation/reductive elimination mechanism similar to that proposed for other transition metal complexes, experimental and DFT studies suggest that the key C-C bond forming reaction occurs via a bimolecular reductive elimination process (devoid of transmetalation). In addition, the stereochemistry of the elimination step was determined experimentally to proceed with complete retention. Ligand and halide effects played an important role in the development and optimization of the catalyst; our data provides an explanation for the ligand effects observed experimentally, useful for future catalyst development. Cyclic voltammetry data is presented that supports redox synergy of the Au center dot center dot center dot Au aurophilic interaction. The monometallic reductive elimination from mononuclear Au(III) complexes is also studied from which we can predict a similar to 15 kcal/mol advantage for bimetallic reductive elimination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available