4.8 Article

Effect of the F610A Mutation on Substrate Extrusion in the AcrB Transporter: Explanation and Rationale by Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 133, Issue 28, Pages 10704-10707

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja202666x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union [MRTN-CT-2005-019335]
  2. COST Action [BM0701 ATENS]
  3. Regione Autonoma della Sardegna
  4. Swiss National Foundation
  5. German Research Foundation [SFB 807]
  6. Cluster of Excellence Macromolecular Complexes at the Goethe-University Frankfurt [DFG-EXC115]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The tripartite efflux pump AcrAB-TolC is responsible for the intrinsic and acquired multidrug resistance in Escherichia coli. Its active part, the homotrimeric transporter AcrB, is in charge of the selective binding of substrates and energy transduction. The mutation F610A has been shown to significantly reduce the minimum inhibitory concentration of doxorubicin and many other substrates, although F610 does not appear to interact strongly with them. Biochemical study of transport kinetics in AcrB is not yet possible, except for some beta-lactams, and other techniques should supply this important information. Therefore, in this work, we assess the impact of the F610A mutation on the functionality of AcrB by means of computational techniques, using doxorubicin as substrate. We found that the compound slides deeply inside the binding pocket after mutation, increasing the strength of the interaction. During subsequent conformational alterations of the transporter, doxorubicin was either not extruded from the binding site or displaced along a direction other than the one associated with extrusion. Our study indicates how subtle interactions determine the functionality of multidrug transporters, since decreased transport might not be simplistically correlated to decreased substrate binding affinity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available