4.8 Article

High-Pressure in Situ 129Xe NMR Spectroscopy and Computer Simulations of Breathing Transitions in the Metal-Organic Framework Ni2(2,6-ndc)2(dabco) (DUT-8(Ni))

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 133, Issue 22, Pages 8681-8690

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja201951t

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SPP 1362]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, we have described the metal-organic framework Ni-2(2,6-ndc)(2)(dabco), denoted as DUT-8(Ni)(1) (DUT = Dresden University of Technology, 2,6-ndc = 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylate, dabco = 1,4-diazabicyclo [2.2.2]octane). Upon adsorption of molecules such as nitrogen and xenon, this material exhibits a pronounced gate-pressure effect which is accompanied by a large change of the specific volume. Here, we describe the use of high-pressure in situ Xe-129 NMR spectroscopy, i.e., the NMR spectroscopic measurements of xenon adsorption/desorption isotherms and isobars, to characterize this effect. It appears that the pore system of DUT-8(Ni) takes up xenon until a liquid-like state is reached. Deeper insight into the interactions between the host DUT-8(Ni) and the guest atom xenon is gained from ab initio molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. van der Waals interactions are included for the first time in these calculations on a metal organic framework compound. MD simulations allow the identification of preferred adsorption sites for xenon as well as insight into the breathing effect at a molecular scale. Grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations have been performed in order to simulate adsorption isotherms. Furthermore, the favorable influence of a sample pretreatment using solvent exchange and drying with supercritical CO2 as well as the influence of repeated pore opening/closure processes, i.e., the aging behavior of the compound, can be visualized by Xe-129 NMR spectroscopy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available