4.8 Article

Diffusion-Controlled Luminescence Quenching in Metal-Organic Frameworks

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 133, Issue 12, Pages 4232-4235

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja111197d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF
  2. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science (BES) [DE-SC0001011]
  3. Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy [DE-EE0003188]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Materials Research [0906662] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Chemistry
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0809776] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diffusion-controlled luminescence quenching of a phosphorescent metal organic framework built from the Ru(bpy)(3)(2+)-derived bridging ligand (MOF-1) was studied using a series of amines of different sizes as quenchers. The dynamics of amine diffusion into solvent-filled MOF-1 channels was probed by modeling time-dependent luminescence quenching data, which provide quantitative diffusion coefficients for the amine quenchers. Triethylamine, tripropylamine, and tributylamine were found to follow Fickian diffusion with a diffusivity of (1.1 +/- 0.2) X 10(-13), (4.8 +/- 1.2) x 10(-14), and (4.0 +/- 0.4) x 10(-14) m(2)/s, respectively. Diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA), on the other hand, was found to be too large to enter the MOF channels. Despite its size, 4-MeOPhNPh2 can enter the MOF channels via a slow, complicated framework/guest intercalation process to result in extensive framework distortion as revealed by powder X-ray diffraction. This work represents the first quantitative study of the dynamics of molecular diffusion into solvent-filled MOF channels. Such quantitative information on molecular diffusion in MOFs is of fundamental importance to many of their potential applications (e.g., heterogeneous catalysis).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available