4.8 Article

Differentiating between Fluorescence-Quenching Metal Ions with Polyfluorophore Sensors Built on a DNA Backbone

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 133, Issue 8, Pages 2664-2671

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja109561e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM067201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A common problem in detecting metal ions with fluorescent chemosensors is the emission-suppressing effects of fluorescence-quenching metal ions. This quenching tendency makes it difficult to design sensors with turn-on signal, and differentiate between several metal ions that may yield a strong quenching response. To address these challenges, we investigate a new sensor design strategy, incorporating fluorophores and metal ligands as DNA base replacements in DNA-like oligomers, for generating a broader range of responses for quenching metal ions. The modular molecular design enabled rapid synthesis and discovery of sensors from libraries on PEG-polystyrene beads. Using this approach, water-soluble sensors 1-5 were identified as strong responders to a set of eight typically quenching metal ions (Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Hg2+, Pb2+, Ag+, Cr3+, and Fe3+). They were synthesized and characterized for sensing responses in solution. Cross-screening with the full set of metal ions showed that they have a wide variety of responses, including emission enhancements and red- and blue-shifts. The diversity of sensor responses allows as few as two sensors (I and 2) to be used together to successfully differentiate these eight metals. As a test, a set of unknown metal ion solutions in blind studies were also successfully identified based on the response pattern of the sensors. The modular nature of the sensor design strategy suggests a broadly applicable approach to finding sensors for differentiating many different cations by pattern-based recognition, simply by varying the sequence and composition of ligands and fluorophores on a DNA synthesizer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available