4.8 Article

Probing Substituent Effects in Aryl-Aryl Interactions Using Stereoselective Diels Alder Cycloadditions

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 132, Issue 10, Pages 3304-3311

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja903653j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [1F32GM082114, GM36700114]
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Women in Science for a postdoctoral fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stereoselective Diels-Alder cycloadditions that probe substituent effects in aryl aryl sandwich complexes were studied experimentally and theoretically. Computations on model systems demonstrate that the stereoselectivity in these reactions is mediated by differential pi-stacking interactions in competing transition states. This allows relative stacking free energies of substituted and unsubstituted sandwich complexes to be derived from measured product distributions. In contrast to gas-phase computations, dispersion effects do not appear to play a significant role in the substituent effects, in accord with previous experiments. The experimental pi-stacking free energies are shown to correlate well with Hammett sigma(m) constants (r = 0.96). These substituent constants primarily provide a measure of the inductive electron-donating and -withdrawing character of the substituents, not donation into or out of the benzene pi-system. The present experimental results are most readily explained using a recently proposed model of substituent effects in the benzene sandwich dimer in which the pi-system of the substituted benzene is relatively unimportant and substituent effects arise from direct through-space interactions. Specifically, these results are the first experiments to clearly show that OMe enhances these pi-stacking interactions, despite being a pi-electron donor. This is in conflict with popular models in which substituent effects in aryl aryl interactions are modulated by polarization of the aryl pi-system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available