4.8 Article

Strain-induced Cleavage of Carbon-Carbon Bonds: Bridge Rupture Reactions of Group 8 Dicarba[2]metallocenophanes

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages 1988-1998

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja9087049

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Royal Society
  2. NSERC of Canada
  3. EPSRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermal treatment of dicarba[2]ferrocenophanes [Fe(eta(5)-C5H4)(2)(CMe2)(2)] (1), rac-[Fe(eta(5)-C4H4)(2)(CHiPr)(2)] (rac-5), and meso-[Fe(eta(5)-C5H4)(2)(CHtBu)(2)] (meso-7) at 240-300 degrees C in the melt led to cleavage of the carbon-carbon bond in the bridge. Compounds 1 and rac-5 underwent intramolecular abstraction of H center dot and yielded ring-opened, vinyl-substituted 1,1'-metallocenes, while meso-7 thermally converted to the more thermodynamically stable rac isomer The corresponding dicarba[2]ruthenocenophanes [Ru(eta(5)-C5H4)(2)(CMe2)(2)] (10), rac-[Ru(eta(5)-C5H4)(2)(CHiPr)(2)] (rac-12), and meso-[Ru(eta(5)-C5H4)(2)(CHtBu)(2)] (meso-15) underwent analogous thermal carbon-carbon bond cleavage but more readily, consistent with a higher degree of ring strain In the case of 7 and 15, the stability of the rac isomers relative to the respective meso isomers was confirmed by DFT studies, despite the former species exhibiting slightly higher tilt angles (alpha/deg) between the two cyclopentadienyl (Cp) rings. Theoretical investigations were used to explore the mechanism of carbon-carbon bond cleavage in dicarba[2]metallocenophanes, confirming the validity of the proposed homolytic bond cleavage mechanism In addition, the potential role of bis-fulvene metal(0) and 'tuck-in' complexes in the bond-cleavage mechanism was assessed This study also provides insight into the mechanism of the thermal ring-opening polymerization of-CH2CH2-bridgeddicarba[2]metallocenophanes and, for the first time, supports a homolytic carbon-carbon bond cleavage pathway

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available