4.8 Article

Covalent Modification of Gaseous Peptide Ions with N-Hydroxysuccinimide Ester Reagent Ions

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 132, Issue 51, Pages 18248-18257

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja107286p

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-00ER15105]
  2. National Institutes of Health [GM 45372]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-00ER15105] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Covalent modification of primary amine groups in multiply protonated or deprotonated polypeptides in the gas phase via ion/ion reactions is demonstrated using N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) esters as the modifying reagents. During the ion/ion reaction, the peptide analyte ions and the NHS or sulfo-NHS based reagent form a long-lived complex, which is a prerequisite for the covalent modification chemistry to occur. Ion activation of the peptide-reagent complex results in a neutral NHS or sulfo-NHS molecule loss, which is a characteristic signature of covalent modification. As the NHS or sulfo-NHS group leaves, an amide bond is formed between a free, unprotonated, primary amine group of a lysine side chain in the peptide and the carboxyl group in the reagent. Subsequent activation of the NHS or sulfo-NHS loss product ions results in sequence informative fragment ions containing the modification. The N-terminus primary amine group does not make a significant contribution to the modification process; this behavior has also been observed in solution phase reactions. The ability to covalently modify primary amine groups in the gas phase with N-hydroxysuccinimide reagents opens up the possibility of attaching a wide range of chemical groups to gaseous peptides and proteins and also for selectively modifying other analytes containing free primary amine groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available