4.8 Article

Control and Manipulation of Gold Nanocatalysis: Effects of Metal Oxide Support Thickness and Composition

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 131, Issue 2, Pages 538-548

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja804893b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Air Force Office for Scientific Research
  2. U.S. Department of Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Control and tunability of the catalytic oxidation of CO by gold clusters deposited on MgO surfaces grown on molybdenum, Mo(100), to various thicknesses are explored through temperature-programmed reaction measurements on mass-selected 20-atom gold clusters and via first-principles density functional theory calculations. Au-20 was chosen because in the gas phase it is characterized as an extraordinarily stable tetrahedral-pyramidal structure. Dependencies of the catalytic activities and microscopic reaction mechanisms on the thickness and stoichiometry of the MgO films and on the dimensionalities and structures of the adsorbed gold clusters are demonstrated and elucidated. Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanisms and reaction barriers corresponding to observed low- and high-temperature CO oxidation reactions are calculated and analyzed. These reactions involve adsorbed O-2 molecules that are activated to a superoxo- or peroxo-like state through partial occupation of the antibonding orbitals. In some cases, we find activated, dissociative adsorption of O-2 molecules, adsorbing at the cluster peripheral interface with the MgO surface. The reactant CO molecules either adsorb on the MgO surface in the cluster proximity or bind directly to the gold cluster. Along with the oxidation reactions on stoichiometric ultrathin MgO films, we also study reactions catalyzed by Au-20 nanoclusters adsorbed on relatively thick defect-poor MgO films supported on Mo and on defect-rich thick MgO surfaces containing oxygen vacancy defects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available