4.8 Article

Investigating the Hydrogen-Bonding Model of Urea Denaturation

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 131, Issue 26, Pages 9304-9310

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja9016057

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-0809854]
  2. Welch Foundation [A1421]
  3. Division Of Chemistry
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0809854] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The direct binding mechanism for urea-based denaturation of proteins was tested with a thermoresponsive polymer, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM). Thermodynamic measurements of the polymer's. hydrophobic collapse were complemented by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, Stokes radius measurements, and methylated urea. experiments. It was found that the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of PNIPAM decreased as urea was added to the solution. Therefore, urea actually facilitated the hydrophobic collapse of the macromolecule. Moreover, these thermodynamic measurements were strongly correlated with amide I band data which indicated that the decrease in the LCST was coupled to the direct hydrogen bonding of urea to the amide moieties of the polymer. In addition, the hydrogen bonding was found to be highly cooperative, which is consistent with a cross-linking (bivalent binding) mechanism. Cross-linking was confirmed by Stokes radius measurements below the polymer's LCST using gel filtration chromatography. Finally, phase transition measurements with methylurea, dimethylurea, and tetramethylurea indicated that these substituted compounds caused the LCST of PNIPAM to rise with increasing methyl group content. No evidence could be found for the direct binding of any of these methylated ureas to the polymer amide moieties by FTIR. These results are inconsistent with a direct hydrogen-bonding mechanism for the urea-induced denaturation of proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available