4.8 Article

Preferential Interactions of Guanidinum Ions with Aromatic Groups over Aliphatic Groups

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 131, Issue 46, Pages 16689-16696

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja903478s

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM63018]
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR-0454672]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Small angle neutron scattering (SANS) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were used to characterize the long-range structuring (aggregation) of aqueous solutions of isopropanol (IPA) and pyridine and the effect on structuring of guanidinium chloride (GdmCl). These solutes serve as highly soluble analogs of the nonpolar aliphatic (IPA) and aromatic (pyridine) side chains of proteins. SANS data showed that isopropanol and pyridine both form clusters in water resulting from interaction between nonpolar groups of the solutes, with pyridine aggregation producing longer-range structuring than isopropanol in 3 m solutions. Addition of GdmCl at 3 m concentration considerably reduced pyridine aggregation but had no effect on isopropanol aggregation. MD simulations of these solutions support the conclusion that long-range structuring involves hydrophobic solute interactions and that Gdm(+) interacts with the planar pyridine group to suppress pyridine-pyridine interactions in solution. Hydrophobic interactions involving the aliphatic groups of isopropanol were unaffected by GdmCl, indicating that the planar and weakly hydrated Gdm+ cation cannot make productive interactions with the highly curved or lumpy aliphatic groups of this solute. These observations support the conclusion that the effects of Gdm+ ions on protein-stabilizing interactions involving aromatic amino acid side chains make significant contributions to the denaturant activity of GdmCl, whereas interactions with the lumpy aliphatic side chains are likely to be less important.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available