4.8 Article

Spectroscopic definition of the ferroxidase site in M ferritin: Comparison of binuclear substrate vs cofactor active sites

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 130, Issue 29, Pages 9441-9450

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja801251q

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R56 DK020251, R01 DK020251-31, DK20251, R01 DK020251] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maxi ferritins, 24 subunit protein nanocages, are essential in humans, plants, bacteria, and other animals for the concentration and storage of iron as hydrated ferric oxide, while minimizing free radical generation or use by pathogens. Formation of the precursors to these ferric oxides is catalyzed at a nonheme biferrous substrate site, which has some parallels with the cofactor sites in other biferrous enzymes. A combination of circular dichroism (CD), magnetic circular dichroism (MCD), and variable-temperature, variable-field MCD (VTVH MCD) has been used to probe Fe(II) binding to the substrate active site in frog M ferritin. These data determined that the active site within each subunit consists of two inequivalent five-coordinate (5C) ferrous centers that are weakly antiferromagnetically coupled, consistent with a mu-1,3 carboxylate bridge. The active site ligand set is unusual and likely includes a terminal water bound to each Fe(II) center. The Fe(II) ions bind to the active sites in a concerted manner, and cooperativity among the sites in each subunit is observed, potentially providing a mechanism for the control of ferritin iron loading. Differences in geometric and electronic structure-including a weak ligand field, availability of two water ligands at the biferrous substrate site, and the single carboxylate bridge in ferritin-coincide with the divergent reaction pathways observed between this substrate site and the previously studied cofactor active sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available