4.8 Article

Induced-fit in the gas phase: Conformational effects on the enantioselectivity of chiral tetra-amide macrocycles

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 130, Issue 2, Pages 522-534

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja073287+

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The structure, stability, and reactivity of proton-bound diastereomeric [M center dot H center dot A](+) complexes between some amino acid derivatives (A) and several chiral tetra-amide macrocycles (M) have been investigated in the gas phase by ESI-FT-ICR and ESI-ITMS-CID mass spectrometry. The displacement of the A guest from the diastereomeric [M center dot H center dot A](+) complexes by reaction with the 2-aminobutane enantiomers (B) exhibits a distinct enantioselectivity with regards to the leaving amino acid A and, to a minor extent, to the amine reactant B. The emerging selectivity picture, discussed in the light of molecular mechanics calculations, provides compelling evidence that the most stable conformers of the selected chiral tetra-amide macrocycles M may acquire in the gas phase a different conformation by induced fit on complexation with some representative amino acid derivatives A. This leads to the coexistence in the gas phase of stable diastereomeric [M center dot H center dot A](+) eq-eq and ax-ax structures, in proportions depending on the configuration of A and M and characterized by different stability and reactivity toward the 2-aminobutane enantiomers. The enantioselectivity of the gas-phase A-to-B displacement in the diastereomeric [M center dot H center dot A](+) complexes essentially reflects the free energy gap between the homo- and heterochiral [M center dot H center dot A](+) complexes, except when the tetra-amidic host presents an additional macrocycle generated by a decamethylene chain. In this case, the measured enantioselectivity mostly reflects the stability difference between the relevant diastereomeric transition structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available