4.7 Article

Development and Characterization of Ag2O-Doped ZnLB Glasses and Biological Assessment of Ag2O-ZnLB-Hydroxyapatite Composites

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages 2732-2740

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05187.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FCT-Fundacao para e Ciencia Tecnologia [PTDC/SAU-BEB/103034/2008]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/SAU-BEB/103034/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work aims to report the preparation, physico-chemical characterization, antibacterial activity, and biocompatibility testing of novel Ag-containing ZnOLi(2)OB(2)O(3)HA composites, which are intended to be applied in bone tissue regenerative applications. Silver oxide (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mol%) doped ZnOLi2OB2O3 (Ag(2)OZLB) glasses were prepared by conventional quenching techniques. The newly developed glasses were characterized by X-ray diffraction, Raman and Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy, and Scanning electron microscopy. Furthermore, glass-ceramic composites (Ag(2)OZnLBHA composites) were obtained by the mixture of 2.5 wt% of each silver glass with 97.5 wt% of hydroxyapatite, and thoroughly characterized. The initial bacteria adhesion was evaluated using Escherichia coli, whereas the biocompatibility profile of these materials was assessed following the establishment of MG63 osteoblast-like cell cultures, for 7 days. All the assayed compositions revealed a significant antibacterial activity against E. coli, at early culture time points. Moreover, osteoblastic cells revealed an adequate adhesion to all the assayed Ag(2)OZnLBHA compositions and following, an active proliferation was established over seeded materials, throughout the culture period. No signs of cytotoxicity were attained by the assessment of cell morphology, viability, and proliferation. Furthermore, the composites containing a higher amount of silver (2 Ag(2)OZnLBHA and 4 Ag(2)OZnLBHA) allowed an increased cell proliferation, in comparison with control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available