4.7 Article

Judd-Ofelt Spectroscopic Study of Er:In:LiNbO3 Crystals For Integrated Optics

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 94, Issue 5, Pages 1460-1466

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04255.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50872089, 60577012]
  2. Key Program for Research on Fundamental to Application and Leading Technology
  3. Tianjin Science and Technology Commission of China
  4. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [CityU 1194/07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Er:In:LiNbO3 crystals were grown by Czochralski method from congruent melts containing 0.5/0.5, 0.5/1.0, and 0.5/1.5 mol%/mol% Er2O3/In2O3. The Er and In concentrations in the crystals were determined by neutron activation analysis. The refractive indices at the 473, 633, and 1536 nm wavelengths were measured by prism coupling technique. The unpolarized Er3+ and OH- absorption spectra of the crystals were measured at room temperature. The Er3+ absorption cross-section spectra were determined, and the Er3+ spectroscopic properties were analyzed by Judd-Ofelt (J-O) theory. The In segregation coefficient is 1.20 +/- 0.06, 0.95 +/- 0.05, and 0.89 +/- 0.05, respectively, and the Er concentrations in all of the three crystals studied have a nearly same value of 1 mol%. The ordinary index decreases while the extraordinary index increases with the increased In doping level. The 0.5 and 1.0 mol% In2O3-doped two crystals are below while the 1.5 mol% In2O3-doped crystal is above the photorefractive threshold concentration. The Er3+ absorption cross sections of some transitions change definitely due to In codoping, but reveal a weak dependence on the In2O3 doping level. The J-O-predicted spectroscopic parameters show similar In codoping effects. The In codoping hardly affects the Er3+ 1.5 mu m radiative lifetime.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available