4.6 Article

Position sensitivity of graphene field effect transistors to X-rays

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 106, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.4921755

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) through the Academic Research Initiative (ARI) [2009-DN-077-ARI036-02]
  3. Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA)
  4. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Device architectures that incorporate graphene to realize detection of electromagnetic radiation typically utilize the direct absorbance of radiation by graphene. This limits their effective area to the size of the graphene and their applicability to lower-energy, less penetrating forms of radiation. In contrast, graphene-based transistor architectures that utilize the field effect as the detection mechanism can be sensitive to interactions of radiation not only with graphene but also with the surrounding substrate. Here, we report the study of the position sensitivity and response of a graphene-based field effect transistor (GFET) to penetrating, well-collimated radiation (microbeam X-rays), producing ionization in the substrate primarily away from graphene. It is found that responsivity and response speed are strongly dependent on the X-ray beam distance from graphene and the gate voltage applied to the GFET. To develop an understanding of the spatially dependent response, a model is developed that incorporates the volumetric charge generation, transport, and recombination. The model is in good agreement with the observed spatial response characteristics of the GFET and predicts a greater response potential of the GFET to radiation interacting near its surface. The study undertaken provides the necessary insight into the volumetric nature of the GFET response, essential for development of GFET-based detectors for more penetrating forms of ionizing radiation. (c) 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available