4.2 Article

Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: A Siren for Primary Care - A Report From the PRImary care MultiEthnic Network (PRIME Net)

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 551-561

Publisher

AMER BOARD FAMILY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.05.110030

Keywords

Pain; Practice-based Research; Primary Health Care; Underserved Populations

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HHSN268200425211C]
  2. Health Resources and Services Administration [D54HP00032-07-00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) are common and have a high degree of morbidity. Previous studies document clinician frustration and variability in CNCP management. We conducted this study to gather in-depth clinicians' views about factors that affect management of CNCP. Methods: We conducted a survey in the Primary Care MultiEthnic Network, a consortium of PBRNs of primary care clinicians practicing in low-income, medically underserved communities, and in a network of private primary care offices. Results: Of 792 clinicians surveyed, 497 (63%) participated. Responses and accompanying narrative comments clustered around 5 themes: (1) barriers to and uncertainties in optimal management; (2) the complex biopsychosocial nature of CNCP; (3) seriousness of prescription opioid abuse; (4) effort and burden required to properly manage CNCP; and (5) clinician commitment to provide care for CNCP patients and benefits of expanded care model for CNCP. One-third reported a severe outcome (death or life-threatening event) in a CNCP patient for whom they had prescribed opioids. Roughly one-third do not initiate prescribing of opioids. Conclusions: Guidelines and increased continuing medical education alone are unlikely to be the solutions to the challenges of CNCP management. Increased evidence for recommendations and resources for more comprehensive care management are needed. (J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:551-561.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available